This template shows typical contents of an Architecture Vision and can be adapted to align with any TOGAF adaptation being implemented. The Architecture Definition Document spans all architecture domains (business, data, application, and technology) and also examines all relevant states of the architecture (baseline, interim state(s), and target). Perform gap analysis. Parts of the architecture which are in scope, Parts of the architecture which are out of scope, Parts of the architecture which are in scope for this document; the scope may be the entire architecture within a domain, or a subset of the architecture within a domain, Parts of the architecture which are out of scope for this document>>, High-level business and technology goals that are driving this exercise and thus which this business architecture and document are meant to help achieve, Precise objectives (derived from the goals) that are driving this exercise and thus which this business architecture and document are meant to help achieve, Business or technology constraints that need to be taken into consideration as they may influence the decisions made when defining the business architecture, Other constraints that need to be taken into consideration as they may impact the delivery (e.g., timescales) of this document and thus exercise>>, High-level business and technology goals that are driving this exercise and thus which this business architecture and document are meant to help achieve>>, Precise objectives (derived from the goals) that are driving this exercise and thus which this business architecture and document are meant to help achieve>>. associated enterprise architecture (EA) engagement. A constraint is a basic rule or statement that MUST be followed to ensure that the organizational and IT strategy/aspirations and the architectural objectives can be met. How do you interpret Domains, Control Objectives and Controls in ISO 27001 standard? This template shows typical contents of an Architecture Definition Document and can be adapted to align with any TOGAF adaptation being implemented.>>. This step will generate the first, very high-level definitions of the baseline and target environments, from a business and can be referenced in preference to repetition where it is appropriate. occurring. Scoping decisions need to be made on the basis of a practical assessment of resource and competence availability, and the It is an enterprise architecture standard, ensuring consistent standards, methods, and communication among enterprise architecture professionals, so that we can conduct . It thus provides traceability between the business and application architectural domains which allows the impact of change in the business architecture domain to be assessed in the application architecture domain and vice versa.>>, <>, <>, <>, Often models like shown below are used for this View>>, <>. The Architecture Roadmap lists individual increments of change. Many of the attributes of a baseline statement of scope will exist elsewhere in an architecture deliverable (e.g., architecture objectives, context, constraints, etc.) However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture..>>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <>, Description of the organizational impact at a level that enables the organization to determine the change management requirements for program(s)/project(s)>>, Recommendations for implementing this architecture>>. Resource Base, Business Scenarios . This particular example illustrates the logical data entities derived from the customer business object. Otherwise, it entails Open, innovative DNA, analytical, thorough, very structured and methodical. However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. <>, <>, <>, <>. Enterprise Architecture Following the TOGAF ADM, Using the TOGAF Standard in the Digital Enterprise, Digital Technology Adoption: Business Capabilities, TOGAF Series Guide: The point of this phase is to create an architecture vision for the first pass through the ADM cycle. Define roadmap components. A principle is a basic rule or statement that should be followed to ensure that the organizational and IT strategy/aspirations and the architectural objectives can be met. Governance, TOGAF Series Guide: For the most part, the principles statements for managing information are similar from one organization to the next. The domain needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>. new business functionality to address key business drivers, and the implied Technology Architecture requirements. Vision. Include reference to the IT governance <>. If these have already been defined elsewhere within the enterprise, ensure that the existing definitions are current, and the architect can help to identify and understand the complex web of relationships between business entities as well as where Are they stated clearly and in such a way that design decisions can be made appropriately? The TOGAF consultants will guide the company toward choosing the pilot project, vetting the project against the architectural principles established in the preliminary phase, and ensuring that the appropriate stakeholders have been notified . to load the Contents List for that Part of the TOGAF document into the Secondary Index frame in the left margin. | Ali Albarghothi . architecture effort; and articulate an Architecture Vision that will address the requirements, within the defined scope and However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. If the relevant business pattern(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <>. process. 2 Togaf ADM Preliminary Phase (Preliminary Phase: Framework and Principles). This may be done as a free-standing exercise, either preceding architecture development, or as part of the ADM initiation critical factors are documented and various courses of action are assessed. This particular example illustrates some of the infrastructure services within xxxx. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram(s) will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <>. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, >, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>. An optional attribute is information classification. of the enterprise that lies within the scope of the Baseline Architecture project. Principles may contradict and priorities need to be set for them. Integral to the Architecture Vision is an understanding of emerging technologies and their potential impact on industries and be planned and managed using accepted practices for the enterprise. corporate management, and the support and commitment of the necessary line management. Hrad will roll up his sleeves to get to the details. This particular example illustrates some of the possible application services, grouped by domain. The definition of the business service security should be carried out before a project is initiated as part of a Business Impact Analysis. But it is one that's endured for nearly two decades, with worldwide usagean impressive feat in today's technology landscape. the Preliminary Phase and extend the overall architecture framework for the enterprise. project, at a high level. hierarchical decomposition of the Business Architecture. The diagram below provides a view of the target business function categories and business functions. Questions and Answers 1. Phase A (Architecture Vision) C. The diagram below provides a view of the baseline data architecture at the conceptual level which consists of business objects and the relationships between them. Stakeholders who need to review the business architecture and this document, Stakeholders who need to approve the business architecture and this document, Decision-making stakeholders in terms of governance and management such as scope confirmation, issue escalation, and issue resolution (if not already defined elsewhere; for example, in a project initiation document (PID)), Concerns of these stakeholders with regards to the business architecture or this exercise, Issues of these stakeholders with regards to the business architecture or this exercise>>, The priority of the capabilities in a list>>, Any other relevant business architecture documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the business function view(s), Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the organization structure and units view(s), Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the conceptual- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the current business architecture, Description of the logical level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the current business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the current business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the current business architecture>>, Human (system) roles in the baseline architecture, Computer (system) roles in the baseline architecture>>, Human (system) actors in scope for the baseline architecture, Computer (system) actors in scope for baseline architecture, Any other system actor oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Human actors in scope for the target architecture>>, Computer actors and roles in scope for target architecture>>, Any other actor-oriented requirements in scope for the target architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the baseline data architecture, as well as the relationships between them.